This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”,it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way,but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person,both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister,whose parents went off when she was very young,and her aunt,the only relative she had,treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began,she didn’t get what she had been expecting——sim* being regarded as a mon person,just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression,Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner,Rochester,a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on,but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry,she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife,who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand,however,she made up her mind to leave,because she didn’t want to betray her own principles,because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife,Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel,but frankly speaking,I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing,this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another,this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong ing with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story,but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates,you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother,in the film “Forrest Gump”)
What’s more,this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself,there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude,but for Rochester,how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact,when Jane met Rochester for the first time,she scared his horse and made his heel strained,to a certain extent,which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it,Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
This is a strong romantic colour realistic novel, mainly describes the novels of Jane love and the love of rochester. Jane eyre is a hero a pure, good at thinking of women, she lives in the bottom, and intermittently hardships.
But she has a stubborn character and to the spirit of happiness for equality. The technique of lyric novel by rich and profound psychological description is exquisite, the resort shows the hero and *e twists and turns of the ups and downs, sing praises love experience the cast off all the old customs and prejudice. Rooted in mutual understanding, mutual respect on the basis of the deep love, has strong shock of the mind force.
Art The most successful in the shape of a dare to resist, dare to fight for freedom and equal status of women image.
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt,the only relative she had,treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——sim* being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)
What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
One hundred and sixty years ago,when Charlotte Bronte created Jane Eyre,she could have never thought that it would become eternal.As a matter of fact, in the world of today,there are tens of thousands of Jane Eyre,each living in a reader's heart,breathing with him the same air and sharing with him the same happiness and sorrow.Her rich mental world has become an inexhaustible resource of spirtual power.From Jane Eyre,people who are timid and shy get confidence and self-respect;people who feel imprisoned get independence and freedom;people who are lonesome get love and care.However, what I get from Jane Eyre is the courage of inner qestioning and self-exploring.
Jane Eyre is a young orphan being raised by Mrs. Reed, her cruel, wealthy aunt. A servant named Bessie provides Jane with some of the few kindnesses she receives, telling her stories and singing songs to her. One day, as punishment for fighting with her bullying cousin John Reed, Jane’s aunt imprisons Jane in the red-room, the room in which Jane’s Uncle Reed died. While locked in, Jane, believing that she sees her uncle’s ghost, screams and faints. She wakes to find herself in the care of Bessie and the kindly apothecary Mr. Lloyd, who suggests to Mrs. Reed that Jane be sent away to school. To Jane’s delight, Mrs. Reed concurs.
Once at the Lowood School, Jane finds that her life is far from idyllic. The school’s headmaster is Mr. Brocklehurst, a cruel, hypocritical, and abusive man. Brocklehurst preaches a doctrine of poverty and privation to his students while using the school’s funds to provide a wealthy and opulent lifestyle for his own family. At Lowood, Jane befriends a young girl named Helen Burns, whose strong, martyrlike attitude toward the school’s miseries is both helpful and displeasing to Jane. A massive typhus epidemic sweeps Lowood, and Helen dies of consumption. The epidemic also results in the departure of Mr. Brocklehurst by attracting attention to the insalubrious conditions at Lowood. After a group of more sympathetic gentlemen takes Brocklehurst’s place, Jane’s life improves dramatically. She spends eight more years at Lowood, six as a student and two as a teacher.
After teaching for two years, Jane yearns for new experiences. She accepts a governess position at a manor called Thornfield, where she teaches a lively French girl named Adèle. The distinguished housekeeper Mrs. Fairfax presides over the estate. Jane’s employer at Thornfield is a dark, impassioned man named Rochester, with whom Jane finds herself falling secretly in love. She saves Rochester from a fire one night, which he claims was started by a drunken servant named Grace Poole. But because Grace Poole continues to work at Thornfield, Jane concludes that she has not been told the entire story. Jane sinks into despondency when Rochester brings home a beautiful but vicious woman named Blanche Ingram. Jane expects Rochester to propose to Blanche. But Rochester instead proposes to Jane, who accepts almost disbelievingly.
The wedding day arrives, and as Jane and Mr. Rochester prepare to exchange their vows, the voice of Mr. Mason cries out that Rochester already has a wife. Mason introduces himself as the brother of that wife—a woman named Bertha. Mr. Mason testifies that Bertha, whom Rochester married when he was a young man in Jamaica, is still alive. Rochester does not deny Mason’s claims, but he explains that Bertha has gone mad. He takes the wedding party back to Thornfield, where they witness the insane Bertha Mason scurrying around on all fours and growling like an animal. Rochester keeps Bertha hidden on the third story of Thornfield and pays Grace Poole to keep his wife under control. Bertha was the real cause of the mysterious fire earlier in the story. Knowing that it is impossible for her to be with Rochester, Jane flees Thornfield.
Penniless and hungry, Jane is forced to sleep outdoors and beg for food. At last, three siblings who live in a manor alternatively called Marsh End and Moor House take her in. Their names are Mary, Diana, and St. John (pronounced “Sinjin”) Rivers, and Jane quickly becomes friends with them. St. John is a clergyman, and he finds Jane a job teaching at a charity school in Morton. He surprises her one day by declaring that her uncle, John Eyre, has died and left her a large fortune: 20,000 pounds. When Jane asks how he received this news, he shocks her further by declaring that her uncle was also his uncle: Jane and the Riverses are cousins. Jane immediately decides to share her inheritance equally with her three newfound relatives.
St. John decides to travel to India as a missionary, and he urges Jane to accompany him—as his wife. Jane agrees to go to India but refuses to marry her cousin because she does not love him. St. John pressures her to reconsider, and she nearly gives in. However, she realizes that she cannot abandon forever the man she truly loves when one night she hears Rochester’s voice calling her name over the moors. Jane immediately hurries back to Thornfield and finds that it has been burned to the ground by Bertha Mason, who lost her life in the fire. Rochester saved the servants but lost his eyesight and one of his hands. Jane travels on to Rochester’s new residence, Ferndean, where he lives with two servants named John and Mary.
At Ferndean, Rochester and Jane rebuild their relationship and soon marry. At the end of her story, Jane writes that she has been married for ten blissful years and that she and Rochester enjoy perfect equality in their life together. She says that after two years of blindness, Rochester regained sight in one eye and was able to behold their first son at his birth.
Actually,not only do I inspired by Jane Eyre's character,but also I am moved by the love of Rochester.I believe that every one of us may have thought about our Mr.Right after reading this book.He doesn't need to be so handsome .However,he must be good to us and take our things as the most important things.Yes, we are all expecting...
由于这本书读了很长时间了，作者的简介大致都以忘却。但这本书的内容，主人公那种顽强不屈的`精神给我留下了深刻的印象。下面我就写一些随感性的东西吧！――题记
说实话，在我读过的书中，大多在脑海中不会留下太多的痕迹。但是，有这样一本书，只要一打开，便会摆脱了书那种单纯的形式，使之融入到你的生命，恰似一朵美丽的花，即使凋谢了，记忆中仍久久的萦绕着它的芬芳。《简爱》就是这样一朵美丽的花。至少我是这样认为的。
第一次读《简·爱》，首先吸引我的是它的名字。我之所以欣赏这个译本，是因为我始终觉得真爱、挚爱都是简单、单纯的，他不带有任何的私心杂念，《简·爱》所宣扬的正是这样的爱，其精神性多于物质性，我特别欣赏男女主人公那种简简单单的爱恋，简和罗彻斯特除了默默深爱着对方，想拥有对方的灵魂外，没有太多地考虑，他们没有什么山盟海誓，也没有任何的甜言蜜语，或许我更愿意用朴实来形容里面的内容，来形容他们的感情，用一个最普通的比喻，一切的一切就好似一本白开水，就好似农夫山泉，让人感觉有点甜。
最吸引我的还是简那种始终追求个人的独立性的精神，哪怕是面对罗彻斯特如幻如神的爱情之箭，她仍旧如意的保持着自己追求*等独立的人格魅力。也许这种魅力使简这个人物深入人心，变得高大。可是现实中的她矮小、苍白，一点也不美。可以说是*凡的不能再*凡，普通得不能再普通，但她身上的那种气质，那种为争得自己尊严，争得人格*等的永不服输的精神是任何人都无法比拟的。
每当夜深人静的时候，我总会独自一人拿出《简·爱》细细体会主人公之间的精神对白，沉浸在他富有诗意和哲理的抒情话语中：“上帝没有赐予我美丽和财富，但我们是*等的，就像我们的领会通过坟墓评定的站在上帝面前。”不知为什么，我特别喜欢这句话。
一直都幻想着自己能迎来一种爱，如简和罗彻斯特一样冲破年龄、财富和地位的障碍，可以超越时空达到心灵感应。简，最终以坚强的品质，出众的才华赢得了幸福，更树立了自己高大的形象：自尊、自爱、自强。
读完这本书，相貌*凡得我心中仿佛增加了一份信心，因为它是我懂得内涵的丰富胜过外表的美丽。
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life.The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer.I am of no exception.As we refer to the movie“Jane Eyer”,it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way,but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person,both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister,whose parents went off when she was very young,and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag.Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began,she didn’t get what she had been expecting——sim* being regarded as a common person,just the same as any other girl around.The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression,Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden.There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner,Rochester,a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside.Jane expected to change the life from then on,but fate had decided otherwise:After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry,she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife,who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation.Jane did want to give him a hand,however,she made up her mind to leave,because she didn’t want to betray her own principles,because she was Jane Eyer.The film has finally got a symbolist end:Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned.After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife,Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel,but frankly speaking,I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words“Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.”For one thing,this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person;for another,this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get.But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result:There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story,but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that“Life is like a box of chocolates,you never know what you would get.”
——《简爱》英文读后感 (菁华3篇)
Jane eyre -- once the advent of 19th century literature sensation, it with an irresistible beauty attracts thousands of readers, have a kind of uncontrollable urge, drives us to picked up the book, and then, the heart also dee* moved for the tremor.
This is a novel with rotation colorific 19th century, is one of the three sisters famous writer * charlotte Bronte with. This is a book with their own hearts and strong spirit pursuit cast a book that contain the author infinite emotion and personality charm, won a brilliant for women of the sky.
Hero Jane figure, appearance is ordinary, skinny no money, no status, but had no ordinary temperament and very abundant emotion world. In her life through the, abandoned women born craven and charming gradually formed the strong and independent personality. She wouldn't be cousin brutal before the princes, but neither willingly. Even if the outcome unsatisfactory, however constant no head, In the devil like cold brock's Mr Hirst tortured by, she can't show any fear, but leisurely carry down, independent strong to survive. Read Jane eyre, I for youth she by the ill treatment and pessimistic, empathy of experience with Jane that young sensitive soul has hurt. I also for Jane and dump. Like her in high position than her so-called gentry in front performance of that kind of thus attitude, like her in the face of love that demonstrate the self-esteem of self-renewal in spirit, mind can't help exclamation in distance in place of her in the progress of modern two hundred years, again a few women have the courage to their dignity of a beloved and rich man say not? Jane can! In her body moments flashed in an independent personality with lofty splendor!
《简爱》19世纪文学的感觉，它以一种不可抗拒的美丽吸引了成千上万的读者，有一种抑制，驱使人拿起这本书，然后，心也深深感动的震颤。
这是一种新型的旋转色彩的19th世纪，是一个三姐妹”的著名作家夏洛蒂勃朗特。这本书是用自己的心和强大的精神追求赶一本书，内容包含作者情感和人格魅力无限，赢得了辉煌的女性的天空。
英雄简身材，相貌*凡，瘦没有钱，没有身份，但不是一个普通的气质和非常丰富的情感世界。在她的生命中，摒弃了农场出生的女性和迷人的逐步形成了强大和独立的个性。她不会再表哥在首领残酷，但也心甘情愿。即使结果令人满意，却常没有头部，在魔鬼喜欢寒冷的布洛克的赫斯特折磨，她不能显示任何的恐惧，而从容的带下去，独立坚强地生存。读《简爱》，我为她的青春和悲观生病治疗，同理心的经验，简，年轻的敏感的灵魂受伤。我也为简和垃圾场。喜欢她的位置比她所谓的绅士高面前表现出的那种这样的态度，喜欢她面对爱情，证明在自尊自强的精神，头脑不禁感叹的地方在距离她的进步的现代二百年，又有几个女人有勇气去他们的尊严，一位敬爱的有钱的男人说不?简!在她的身体时刻闪现着一个独立的人格和崇高的光彩!
this is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. the story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit
it seems to me that many readers’ english reading experience starts with jane eyer. i am of no exception. as we refer to the movie “jane eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
jane eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. since jane’s education in lowwood orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——sim* being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. the suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.as a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, jane got a chance to be a tutor in thornfield garden. there she made the acquaintance of lovely adele and that garden’s owner, rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: after jane and rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was jane eyer. the film has finally got a symbolist end: jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. after finding rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, jane chose to stay with him forever.
i don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, i would rather regard the section that jane began her teaching job in thornfield as the film’s end----especially when i heard jane’s words “never in my life have i been awaken so happily.” for one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. but the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: there must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of jane’s life that “life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (by forrest gump’s mother, in the film “forrest gump”)
what’s more, this film didn’t end when jane left thornfield. for jane eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for rochester, how he can get salvation? the film gives the answer tentatively: jane eventually got back to rochester. in fact, when jane met rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant rochester would get retrieval because of jane. we can consider rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. the fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. after it, rochester got the mercy of the god and the love of the woman whom he loved. here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. the value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the
beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. in the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.
in this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. we are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the sargasso sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. it’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.
heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. indubitably, “jane eyer” is one of them.
由于这本书读了很长时间了，作者的简介大致都以忘却。但这本书的内容，主人公那种顽强不屈的精神给我留下了深刻的印象。下面我就写一些随感性的东西吧！――题记
说实话，在我读过的书中，大多在脑海中不会留下太多的痕迹。但是，有这样一本书，只要一打开，便会摆脱了书那种单纯的形式，使之融入到你的生命，恰似一朵美丽的花，即使凋谢了，记忆中仍久久的萦绕着它的芬芳。《简爱》就是这样一朵美丽的花。至少我是这样认为的。
第一次读《简·爱》，首先吸引我的是它的名字。我之所以欣赏这个译本，是因为我始终觉得真爱、挚爱都是简单、单纯的，他不带有任何的私心杂念，《简·爱》所宣扬的正是这样的爱，其精神性多于物质性，我特别欣赏男女主人公那种简简单单的爱恋，简和罗彻斯特除了默默深爱着对方，想拥有对方的'灵魂外，没有太多地考虑，他们没有什么山盟海誓，也没有任何的甜言蜜语，或许我更愿意用朴实来形容里面的内容，来形容他们的感情，用一个最普通的比喻，一切的一切就好似一本白开水，就好似农夫山泉，让人感觉有点甜。
最吸引我的还是简那种始终追求个人的独立性的精神，哪怕是面对罗彻斯特如幻如神的爱情之箭，她仍旧如意的保持着自己追求*等独立的人格魅力。也许这种魅力使简这个人物深入人心，变得高大。可是现实中的她矮小、苍白，一点也不美。可以说是*凡的不能再*凡，普通得不能再普通，但她身上的那种气质，那种为争得自己尊严，争得人格*等的永不服输的精神是任何人都无法比拟的。
每当夜深人静的时候，我总会独自一人拿出《简·爱》细细体会主人公之间的精神对白，沉浸在他富有诗意和哲理的抒情话语中：“上帝没有赐予我美丽和财富，但我们是*等的，就像我们的领会通过坟墓评定的站在上帝面前。”不知为什么，我特别喜欢这句话。
一直都幻想着自己能迎来一种爱，如简和罗彻斯特一样冲破年龄、财富和地位的障碍，可以超越时空达到心灵感应。简，最终以坚强的品质，出众的才华赢得了幸福，更树立了自己高大的形象：自尊、自爱、自强。
读完这本书，相貌*凡得我心中仿佛增加了一份信心，因为它是我懂得内涵的丰富胜过外表的美丽。
——《简爱》英文读后感带翻译 (菁华3篇)
"Jane Eyre" is a novel with a rotation of the color, it told people the true meaning of life.
"Jane Eyre" Bronte, author of gentle, pure, like the pursuit of some good things, despite the poverty of her family, from the loss of maternal love, combined with her short stature, appearance is not outstanding, but perhaps such a soul deep inferiority complex, reflected in her character is a very self-esteem. Her of Jane Eyre is a beautiful, little woman, but she has an extremely strong sense of self.
Jane Eyre in a survival environment, from an early age with their peers under the same treatment as people do not, aunt of the , cousin of contempt, insult and tortured cousin ...... perhaps it is because of all this, for Back to the Jane Eyre indomitable confidence and strong , a personality to overcome the inherent strength. she has steadfastly pursued a bright, holy, better life.
In before, she never because he is an inferior status of the family teachers feel inferior, but think they are equal. It is because of her integrity, high moral character, pure, spiritual not secular society of pollution, making Rochester was shocked, and she can be seen as an equal in spirit and their own people to talk to, and dee* in love with her .
And when they get married that day, Jane Eyre know Rochester has a wife, she must feel that they want to leave, although she said, "I want God to com* with the law issued by the world , I would like to stick to living a sober and sometimes I was not as so crazy now when accepted . " But speaking from the heart, deeper love Jane realize that they are being cheated, shes self-esteem has been teased because she loved Rochester. However, Jane Eyre has made a very rational decision. In such a strength of love under siege, in the prosperous life under the , she still has to adhere to their own dignity as an individual, this is the spirit of Jane Eyre the most charming place.
Novel design of a very bright at the end - although Rochesters manor destroyed, he himself became a disability, but it is such a condition, so that Jane Eyre is no longer in the dignity and the conflict between love and at the same time access to their own dignity and love.
In todays society, people are mad for money and status of submerged love. In between poor and rich choice of the rich, and in love with does not love does not love to choose between. Few people will be like this for the love of Jane Eyre to abandon all for the character, and without looking back. "Jane Eyre" by the show to us is a kind of getting back to basics, is a fully paid by the pursuit of love, there are as a human being should have dignity. It is like a cup of ice water, purifying the hearts of everyone.
《简爱》是一部带有自转色彩的小说，它告诉人们一个人生的真谛。
《简爱》的作者夏洛蒂勃朗特温柔，清纯，喜欢追求一些美好的东西，尽管她家境贫穷，从小失去了母爱，再加上她身材矮小，容貌不出众，但也许就是这样一种灵魂深处的自卑，反映在她的性格上就是一种非常敏感的自尊。她描写的简爱也是一个不美的，矮小的女人，但是她有着极其强烈的自尊心。
简爱生存在一个寄人篱下的环境，从小就承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇，姨妈的嫌弃，表姐的蔑视，表哥的侮辱和毒打......也许正是因为这一切，换回了简爱无限的信心和坚强不屈的性格，一种可战胜的内在人格力量.她坚定不移地去追求一种光明的，圣洁的，美好的生活。
在罗切斯特的面前，她从不因为自己是一个地位低贱的家庭教师而感到自卑，反而认为他们是*等的。也正因为她的正直，高尚，纯洁，心灵没有受到世俗社会的污染，使得罗切斯特为之震撼，并把她看作了一个可以和自己在精神上*等交谈的人，并且深深爱上了她。
而当他们结婚的那一天，简爱知道了罗切斯特已有妻子时，她觉得自己必须要离开，她虽然讲，“我要遵从上帝颁发世人认可的法律，我要坚守住我在清醒时而不是像现在这样疯狂时所接受的原则”。但是从内心讲，更深一层的是简爱意识到自己受到了欺骗，她的自尊心受到了戏弄，因为她深爱着罗切斯特。但简爱做出了一个非常理性的决定。在这样一种爱情力量包围之下，在富裕的生活诱惑之下，她依然要坚持自己作为个人的尊严，这是简爱最具有精神魅力的地方。
小说设计了一个很光明的结尾－－虽然罗切斯特的庄园毁了，他自己也成了一个残废，但正是这样一个条件，使简爱不再在尊严与爱之间矛盾，而同时获得自己的尊严和真爱。
在当今社会，人们都疯狂地为了金钱和地位而淹没爱情。在穷与富之间选择富，而在爱与不爱之间选择不爱。很少有人会像简爱这样为爱情为人格抛弃所有，而且义无反顾。《简爱》所展现给我们的正是一种返朴归真，是一种追求全心付出的爱情，还有作为一个人应有的尊严。它犹如一杯冰水，净化每一个人的心灵。
Is it because Im plain, unknown to the public, as pour as a church mouse, tall and thin, with no soul, no heart, you are wrong, I have as much soul as you, Im full as much heart!
Charlotte, Jane Eyre
"Jane Eyre" is the history of British literature as a classic masterpieces, it successfully portrays the history of British literature in the first to love, life, society and religion are independent and proactive attitude and dare to struggle, dare to fight for freedom and equality of women image.
All the women who love foreign literary works like to read Charlottes Jane Eyre. If we think that Charlotte writes Jane love only to write this lingering love. I think its wrong. The author is also a woman, living in the middle of the nineteenth Century in the fluctuating UK, when thought had a new start. The most permeated in Jane Eyre is this idea - the independent consciousness of women. Let us imagine that if Janes independence has long been strangled in Jirenlixia childhood life; if she does not have the independence, she had and his wife and daughter live together in Rochester, began to have money, and status of new life; if she does not share of purity, we are now in the hands of "Jane Eyre" is no longer touching the tears of the classic. So, I began to think about why Jane Eyre moved us and loved it - it was her independent character and the charm of her heart.
However, we can not help but ask, is this only one step to be independent? I dont think it is. After all, the independence of women is a long process, not overnight. It needs a thorough courage, like Jane then decided to leave Rochester, "the wind rustling Xi Zhuang earth went to the Yi River is so cold, did not return" bold and daring. I think this should be the most critical step, and it should be a decisive step towards independence. Charlottes Jane Eyre has left her stubborn character and independent personality to us. So she is a successful, happy woman.
Jane has been an independent female classic, I hope the sun, flowers in more Jane walked out, whether poor or rich; whether beautiful or homely, have a good mind and enrich the mind, can be an independent personality and a strong personality life.
难道就因为我一贫如洗，默默无闻，长相*庸，个子瘦小，就没有灵魂，没有心肠了——你想错了，我的心灵跟你一样丰富，我的心胸一样充实！
——《简爱》夏洛蒂
《简爱》是英国文学史上的一部经典传世之作，它成功地塑造了英国文学史中第一个对爱情、生活、社会以及宗教都采取了独立自主的积极进取态度和敢于斗争、敢于争取自由*等地位的女性形象。
大凡喜爱外国文学作品的女性，都喜欢读夏洛蒂的《简爱》。如果我们认为夏洛蒂仅仅只为写这段缠绵的爱情而写《简爱》。我想，错了。作者也是一位女性，生活在波动变化着的英国１９世纪中叶，那时思想有着一个崭新的开始。而在《简爱》里渗透最多的也就是这种思想——女性的独立意识。让我们试想一下，如果简爱的独立，早已被扼杀在寄人篱下的童年生活里；如果她没有那份独立，她早已和有妻女的罗切斯特生活在一起，开始有金钱，有地位的新生活；如果她没有那份纯洁，我们现在手中的《简爱》也不再是令人感动的流泪的经典。所以，我开始去想，为什么《简爱》让我们感动，爱不释手——就是她独立的性格，令人心动的人格魅力。
然而，我们不禁要问，仅这一步就能独立吗？我认为，不会的。毕竟女性的独立是一个长期的过程，不是一蹴而就的。它需要一种彻底的勇气，就像简爱当年毅然离开罗切斯特一样，需要“风潇潇兮易水寒，壮土一去兮不复返”的豪迈和胆量。我想，这应该才是最关键的一步，也应该是走向独立的决定性的一步。而夏洛蒂笔下的简爱却把她倔强的性格，独立的个性留给我们一个感动。所以她是成功的，幸福的女性。
简爱已作为独立女性的经典，我希望阳光下，鲜花里有更多的简爱走出来，不管是贫穷，还是富有；不管是美貌，还是相貌*庸，都有美好的心灵和充实的心胸，都能以独立的人格和坚强的个性生活。
"Jane Eyre" this novel, shaped the maintenance of independent personality, the pursuit of individual freedom, advocate equality, do not yield to the fate of women, mainly wrote Jane Eyre and Mr. Rochester between twists and turns of love story. The *e Jane Eyres parents died, living in an environment that ruthlessly trampled on her dignity, but this did not change Jane Eyres infinite confidence and unyielding spirit.
Jane Eyre is sent to a boarding school, where she learns from her good friend Helen an inner strength - - patience. Jane Eyre came to Roche side, her integrity, noble make Rochester shocked, and his heart, Jane Eyre moved.
When they get married that day, Jane Eyre found Rochester has a wife, her pride was teased, she left Rochester with grief and love. In the end, Jane Eyre returned to Rochester and married him.
《简爱》这本小说，塑造了维护独立人格、追求个性自由、主张人人*等、不向命运低头的女性，主要写了简·爱与罗切斯特先生之间一波三折的爱情故事。女主人公简爱父母双亡，生活在一个对她的尊严无情践踏的环境里，而这却没有改变简·爱无限的信心和坚强不屈的精神然。
简爱被送到了一个寄宿学校，在这里，她从她的好朋友海伦那里学到一种内在力量———忍耐。简爱来到了罗切斯身边，她的正直，高尚使得罗切斯特为之震撼，而他的真心，让简爱感动。
而当他们结婚的那一天，简·爱发现罗切斯特已有妻子、她的自尊心受到了戏弄，她怀着悲痛与爱离开了罗切斯特。最后，简·爱重新回到了罗切斯特身边，并与他结了婚。
——简爱名著读后感 (菁华6篇)
英国著名女作家夏洛蒂-勃朗特的长篇小说《简·爱》，是一部在英国文学史上有着显著地位，在世界文学史上闻名遐迩的不朽著作。
夏洛蒂在书中成功地塑造了简·爱这位敢于反抗，敢于追求自由*等的妇女形象。
简·爱从小父母双亡，寄居舅妈家，备受不公，后来被送到劳渥德孤儿院。在那所名为慈善机构的寄宿学校里，简·爱受尽磨难，但仁爱之心不泯，也进一步磨砺了她反抗邪恶的斗争意志。后来，简·爱无论是在桑菲尔德做一名家庭教师，还是在圣约翰家，她都自尊，自爱，自强。在爱情上，她重视与罗切斯特的“友好坦率”，而不是万贯的家财和显赫的门第。简·爱还拒绝了圣约翰以上帝的意旨为理由，而不是出自内心心心相印的真爱而提出的求婚。最后，简·爱终于与她一心深爱的被烧伤致残，双目失明的罗切斯特结婚，得到了她甘愿为之献身的高尚纯洁的爱情。这位长相*凡，身材瘦小的女子，在夏洛蒂细腻流畅的笔下所展示出来的'善良，温柔，坚贞，坦诚的迷人魅力，让人久久不能释怀。
简·爱，这样一位如此*凡，却又如此不*凡的女孩。对生命的热爱，对真爱的执着，她身上的任何一点都足以使她成为一位永远能留在人们心中的女孩。难怪连文学巨匠萨克雷都说：“《简·爱》使我非常感动，非常喜爱。这是我能花好多天来读的第一本英国小说。”
简·爱，她带给人们的已经不在只是单纯的深思和联想，她带给人们更多的我想还是她那不屈不挠，坚韧不拔的人生态度和朴实无华，坦率真挚的生活作风吧。祝福吧，为简·爱祝福，为简·爱终于得到了她的幸福而祝福吧;祝福吧，为自己祝福，为自己能住在这样一个幸福的空间而祝福吧。
我读过很多名著，有《钢铁是怎样炼成的》《骆驼祥子》《格列弗游记》《简爱》等等，其中有一位主人公夏洛蒂·勃朗特给我留下了深刻的印象，这篇名著就是《简爱》。
这部小说以第一人称叙述，有强烈的主观色彩，亲切感人。主人公简爱是孤女，成年后到桑菲尔德贵族庄园当家庭教师，她身份低微，相貌**，却以真挚的情感和高尚的品德赢得了东家罗切斯特的尊敬和爱恋，不料在举行婚礼时却横生枝节，使她不得不面对更多的磨难和考验，小说情节曲折，气氛诡异，悬念迭起。
简爱的人生追求有两个基本“旋律”组成。
首先，她富于激情、幻想和反抗精神，是浪漫主义文学传统的精神女儿。她自幼父母双亡，寄住在舅妈家，身无分文，又是弱女子，是双重的“低残者”，然而她热忱刚烈，童年时曾和表哥，舅妈以及学校校长对抗，长大后，又曾因为渴求更丰富的人生而勇敢地放弃了已有的“饭碗”。在桑菲尔德庄园，她也一直坚定地捍卫自己的独立和尊严，并勇敢地宣布了自己对罗切斯特的爱情。
对人间自由幸福的渴望和对更高精神境界的追求是女主人公的两个基本动机。两者间即相互对立，又相互补充，相互对话。简爱就是这样不断自我斗争走向成熟的。她在婚事受阻后毅然离开自己所爱的人远走他乡，便是她通过痛苦反思，对爱情和罗切斯特本人认识逐步深化的结果。
小说始终洋溢着浓郁真挚，丰富细腻的情感，这与作品自传体的叙事语气显然密不可分，那娓娓道来的内心独白和色彩斑斓的景物描写，以及悬念的巧妙设计和气氛的渲染，都增加了作品的'艺术感染力，根据这部小说改编的电影也一度风靡全世界，把这个美丽的故事传遍了地球的每一个角落。
在暑假里，我看了一本世界名著——《简·爱》。小说的主人公简·爱是个孤儿，但她是一个孤儿，但她是一个不甘**、自尊自爱、自立自强、敢于抗争、敢于追求的女性。她那淳朴善良的高尚品质深深打动了我。
简·爱的母亲原是一位富家小姐，她爱上了一位穷牧师。他们不顾亲友的反对结了婚，富家小姐的父母所以和她断绝关系。他们结婚后一年生下了简·爱。可是就在简爱出生那年，他父母因感染流行风寒去世了。简爱成了孤儿，被送进了孤儿院。之后他舅舅把她接回府上住。可是不久舅舅也去世了，在简爱十岁那年把她送到一个慈善学校。他在那地狱般的学校生活了八年，还当了两年教师，之后到桑菲尔德府当家庭教师。
简爱长得矮小，并不漂亮，但他聪明伶俐，正直善良。不久，主人罗切斯特爱上了这个无财无貌的简爱，简爱也爱上了比她大2多岁的主人罗切斯特。在教堂结婚那天，有人揭穿罗切斯特还有一个疯老婆。简爱明白后便毅然出走，离开了这个她深爱的人，流浪了两天两夜。在她快要饿死的情景下，奥利佛一家救了她，还帮她找到了一份工作——乡村教师。
在这期间他继承了他叔叔的财产，成为了富有的人。当他突然明白自我能够继承2万英镑成为富翁时——要明白她当乡村教师的年收入才3英镑，他显得还是那么*静，没有过分的激动。而当他明白她在世上还有几个亲人——正好是救过自我的奥利佛兄妹时，却高兴的简直疯了。他主动提出把遗产与奥利佛兄妹三人*分。多么慷慨大方，一个不为金钱所迷惑，把亲情和友情放在第一的人啊！
整本书写的就是简爱一个灰姑娘的人生经历。一方面，她在追求自我的幸福，不甘心命运的安排；第二方面，她又在捍卫自我的人格和尊严。这个故事，能够说是一个灰姑娘的奋斗史。她在追求一个基本的权力：*等。
《简爱》这本书还告诉我们依靠自我的正直品德和聪明才智，只要坚忍不拔的艰苦奋斗，勇往直前，是能够冲破重重险阻，到达自我的目的`的。
这个寒假，我重读《简爱》，第三被。简爱—一个普通的女孩。没出众的外表，没显贵的出身。然而，正是如此一个一般人，却有着坚强的内心，她坚强与真挚的心灵，给了我深深的启迪。
我喜欢简爱，这个女孩她*凡，却不；她的生活起伏波澜，但她美好的追求从未停止。
看看简爱，你会发现，作为一个一般人，只须付出努力，也能创造出漂亮的天地。一个一般人，她可以深入的体味周围的花花草草，她可以专注的聆听动人的莺语。或许她也会被琐事烦扰，但所有又怎能她对生活的热情？由于一般，她可以选择静静地考虑，简爱发现了那些掩藏在华丽下的丑恶，也发现了一颗颗善良的心灵。所有些风言冷语从未浇灭她心中的火焰，因她不是为了心死而降生，来到，她是为了探寻幸福。
简爱一般，但她却给了大家一种真实。没华丽的衣装，没浓厚的，外表上，简爱展示的是她的青春，展示的是她的真实。而行动上，她更是展示了真实的。小时候在姑妈家，她不招人喜欢，由于在其他人眼里，她一直那样没规矩，不懂礼貌。由于，她从来不会为了得到称赞和励，而讨、里德姑妈，她会直言说出心中的不满；面对表哥约翰的一再，她也会不考虑形象地奋起。简爱用她的真实想法来支配我们的行动，期望展示给大家她的真实一面。可是周围人的漠然、不理解、甚至让间爱变成了他们心中的。简爱一直努力着，使大家同意她，纵使不喜欢她的人永远也不会理解她。
她的*凡，她的真挚，这两者的对比，将简爱的形象第三展示在眼前：那个并不好看的女孩、朴素的穿着，看起来那样的柔弱，却耐心地着一个七八岁的小姑娘，付出了无穷无尽的关爱；面对着我们的主人，这位渺小的家庭教师如此吐露着我们的想法：你不~你并不~你也不~
如此的回答非常不礼貌，但简爱勇敢地指出了罗切斯特先生的缺点，体现出了她待人的诚恳。她取得了他人的尊重，也赢取了罗切斯特先生的爱慕。简是个坚强的女生。面对生活的，她一直勇敢应付；挫折成了她生命的阶梯，困难一直了她的意志。这么一个一般的女孩用奋斗取得了生命的春暖花开。
作为一个一般人，只须真诚，只须勇敢，只须努力，就可以收成漂亮。
简爱是一个贫苦低微、其貌不扬、性格倔强、感情丰富、独立自尊、勇敢执着、聪慧过人的女孩，她对自己的命运、价值、地位的思考和努力把握，对自己的思想和人格有着理性的认识，对自己的幸福和情感有着坚定的追求。从简爱身上，我们看到了当今新女性的形象：自尊、自重、自立、自强，对于自己的人格、情感、生活、判断、选择的坚定理想和执着追求。作为一个心地纯洁、善于思考的女性，她生活在社会底层，受尽磨难。她的生活遭遇令人同情，但她那倔强的性格和勇于追求*等幸福的精神更为人们所赞赏。
在里德太太家，10岁的简面对舅母、表兄妹的歧视和虐待，己经表现出强烈的反抗精神。当她的表兄殴打她时，她勇于回击；当舅母嚷着叫自己的孩子远离她时，她高喊“他们不配和我在一起”；当她被囚禁在空房中时，想到自己所受到的'虐待，从内心发出了“不公正”的呐喊。在孤儿院，简的反抗性格更为鲜明，这和她的朋友海伦·朋斯忍耐顺从的性格形成了明显的对比。海伦·朋斯虽遭迫害却信奉“爱你的仇人”，在宗教的麻痹下没有仇恨，只有逆来顺受。而简对冷酷的校长和摧残她们的教师深恶痛绝。她对海伦说：“假如她用那根条子打我，我要从她手里把它夺过来，并且当面折断它。”充分表露了她不甘屈辱和不向命运妥协的倔强性格。
作为一个外国人，我对英国人的思维和宗教信仰有点难以适应。不过呢，人世间的真情多数是相通的。每当我读到小简爱因为无亲无故而遭受虐待和歧视时，心中顿起的怜悯之情真让人难忘；每当简爱一次次化险为夷让我多么兴奋；当她勇敢地拒绝了圣约翰的求婚而坚持自己心中的真爱时,多么令鼓舞和震撼；特别在文章最后,她抛弃一切去照顾那位可怜的爱德华时，我的心中欣慰与感动迸发而出。
在我生日的那一天，我收到了阿姨送给我的特别礼物：一本书。书名叫做《简·爱》。这是一本让人看了感受颇深的书，才读了几页，我就爱不释手了。
小说的主人公简·爱是一位坚强不屈、自强自立的人。简·爱从小就生活在舅妈家中，过着寄人篱下的生活。承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇：姨妈的嫌弃，表姐的蔑视，表哥的侮辱和毒打，可她没有绝望。最终因为不服管教，而被送进了一家“慈善学校”，在那里虽然也受到了同样的迫害，但却得到了良师益友的真诚帮助和教益，逐步成长为一位很有爱心，具有丰富学识的女性，她在庄园当家庭教师时，经历了许多稀奇古怪的事，并与庄园主人共坠爱河，最后，他们俩幸福地在一起了。
我很喜欢《简·爱》的作者在书中写到的一句名言：“我们是*等的……至少我们通过坟墓，*等地站到上帝面前。”事实上的确如此：每个人的心灵一样丰富，每个人的心胸一样充实。虽然有人富有，有人贫穷，但每个人的精神是*等的。就像每个人穿过坟墓，站在上帝脚下，彼此*等。所以，我们不能埋怨上帝对我们不公*，因为我们是*等的。
我也非常喜欢简·爱这个人物。虽然她受尽了别人的冷眼，歧视，迫害。但她坚强不屈，从不叫苦，不叫痛，也没有恨别人，并且也没有放弃自己，而是遇到困难不退缩，乐观开朗地去面对它。她也是一位善良有爱心的人，她喜欢的罗切斯特为了救自己的妻子而失去了一只眼睛和胳膊，另外一只眼睛也不好了，并且妻子也没有了。而简·爱并没有嫌弃他，厌恶他，和他幸福地度过了每一天，与此同时，罗切斯特的眼睛也在慢慢恢复。我希望自己也能成为一个像简·爱那样的人，一个遇到困难不退缩、乐观开朗、坚强不屈的人。
《简·爱》是一本女孩子必读的书、这本书宣扬的是一种坚强不屈，遇到困难不退缩的精神。这种精神人人都需要，它会让看过这本书的人变得勇敢，坚强，学会去战胜困难！
——简爱高中读后感 (菁华6篇)
这是一个浪漫，凄美的故事。刻画出了一位相貌**，却追逐幸福，*等生活的女性。
简爱生在一个贫困的家庭中，她从小父母双亡，过着寄人篱下的生活，过着比女仆还苦的生活。舅妈的嫌恶，表哥表姐的嘲讽。长大后的简爱去了桑菲尔德堡当家庭教师。不久和这里的罗切斯特先生相爱。她觉得他对她并不是主于仆，而是好朋友。她喜欢与他交谈，并觉得与他交谈很快乐，很幸福！
读《简爱》有感两人即将成为一对新人，简爱却听到她一直深爱的罗切斯特已有人妻！她含泪离开，她的身心受到了欺骗，自尊受到了嘲弄。在百人拥戴，享尽荣华富贵和*凡自由的诱力下，她选择了过*凡，自由的生活。
她再次回到那个既让她高兴又难过的地方，那个曾经对她无微不至的人有了重大改变： 他瞎了，残了，虽然没有当年火热的激情，但那颗炽热的心没有变，他渴望，渴望原谅他，渴望她回来，渴望和她一起生活！
书本合上，可我的心却久久不能*静。简爱的善良，回绝表哥时的坚毅，得知桑菲尔德堡失火时的慌乱，见到罗切斯特时的喜悦......在脑海中不断闪现，他最终知道，罗切斯特是她的依托，她爱他！
我为简爱高兴，她找到了对她来说极为重要的人！她不漂亮，个子很低，没有家世，没有背景。但罗切斯特叫她"小精灵"，一开始我怎么也想不通，简爱怎么会是小精灵呢？当看完书后，也许，是爱把简爱美化了，她是罗切斯特心中唯一，也是最美的小精灵！
我也为简爱庆祝，她的努力和付出都得到了回报。虽然罗切斯特不是当年那个威风凛凛，家产百万的先生了。简爱的回归是他感情和物质上的恩惠。没有什么可以阻挡两人幸福自由的脚步了。他们手牵着手向小木屋走去。
这是美好的结局，圆满的句号
读完《简爱》后，女主人公的形象深深出动了我。她的勇气、坚强以及执着的精神让我佩服得五体投地，是我们学*的楷模。
这个故事主要讲述了一个名叫简爱的女主人公，从小失去了父母，寄养在舅母家里。简爱在很小的时候就努力地做一个既懂事又乖巧听话的好孩子，但始终未能得到舅母的喜爱，她为此十分苦恼。后来得知有求学的机会便努力争取，这意味着她将孤身一人踏上求学的路途，前途的渺茫并未使她畏惧，反而为她赢得了人生第一次转机。
其学校实行的教育十分残酷。但迫于对知识的渴望，简爱都坚强勇敢地挺过来了。在那里简爱除了学*知识外，而结交了一些志同道合的朋友。这段学校生活奠定了她一生简朴的生活方式。
简爱在毕业后继续鼓起勇气来迎接新生活的挑战。她最后来都桑菲尔德庄园当起了家庭教师，使人意想不到的是遇到了心上人，让她感受到了爱情的力量。但突如其来的爱情因二人地位悬殊，使简爱又兴奋又焦虑，她始终相信在真爱面前，一切因素都显得如此渺茫，就如同大海中的一滴水——不值得一提。然而命运却和她开了个玩笑：在简爱答应罗切斯特的求婚时，一个深藏了多年的秘密被掀了出来，使这段婚姻成了泡影，最终简爱痛苦离乡。
在故事的结尾，简爱又重新回到了罗切斯特的身边，照顾身患火烧的丈夫，并且幸福地生活在一起。
无论是孤苦的童年，还是在爱情面前痛苦抉择时，简爱从未放弃过自尊和自爱。
我很佩服故事中的女主人公简爱，因为她经历了一些常人难以忍受的痛苦，她有面对困难和挑战生活的勇气。我们也许不会遇到简爱所遭遇的种种，但多多少少也会出现不同程度的挫折在人生的旅途中等着我们，我们只要有简爱一半的'坚强、一半的执着、一半的勇气，我们手握有形的枪，脑有无形的枪一起击毙重重阻碍，赢得胜利。我们能否掌握自己的命运全靠你是否有勇气来挑战和面对。
《简爱》描述了人这一生最渴望得到又很难拥有的几样东西，即勇气、坚强执着、爱以及尊严。你拥有过这些东西吗？那还等什么，快来追求吧！
读完《简爱》后，我想以勇气、坚强以及执着的态度来面对生活。简爱的形象也将成为我生活中的影子，时常提醒我，要有勇气来面对困难，将其击败，你准为最终胜利者。
“难道就因为我一贫如洗，长相*庸，个子矮小，就没有灵魂，没有心肠了？——你想错了，我的心灵跟你一样丰富！我的心胸跟你一样充实！”
————《简·爱》
轻嗅着书香，轻扫着文字，在哪个落叶纷飞的下午，我看到了傲视风霜的野菊，也一样看到了你——简·爱挺直的身躯。你自尊，你自强，你善于思索，你敢于追求······当你那双乌黑发亮的眸子注视着我时，我胆怯了，我震惊了：在那个男尊女卑的19世纪，如果是我，一个*庸又卑微的女孩，我会低头，会认命，会叹息，会随波逐流。可我代表的是那个世纪的女性哪！而你，夏洛蒂·勃朗特的觉醒，希冀和缩影，注定是不*凡的，也注定是轰动全世界的！
在舅妈的嫌弃，表哥表姐的蔑视和毒打下，你不屈服！在8年孤儿院的围墙里，你不沉沦，渴望自由！在海伦和谭波尔小姐的熏陶下，你正直，懂得感恩！在发现自己所爱的人——罗切斯特早有妻子时，你断绝念想，毅然离开！在罗切斯特为救疯了的纵火的妻子残疾无助时，那时的你已富有，却又义无反顾地回到了他的身边······
你的一切品质都是我所缺失的。记得有一次，我遇到了数学难题，在看到它的第一眼，就想到了放弃。可毋庸置疑，要是你，肯定会不服输，抗争到底的！还有一次，在学旱冰时，我摔了几跤，便认为自己没有学旱冰的潜力。偿若是你，肯定会咬紧牙关不放弃吧！
你高尚纯洁，独立*等，不仅值得当时的女性学*，更是当今人们学*的典范！
在阳光下，在鲜花里，我分明看见你灰色的衣裙越来越远，慢慢地绽放成了秋菊、冬梅、夏荷、绽放成了沙漠里一朵傲放于风沙中的仙人掌花！
我多么希望有更多的你——简·爱涌出来，无论贫穷还是富裕，无论美丽还是*庸那个，都能自尊、自强，都能有美好的心灵和充实的心胸，都能独立、坚强的生活！
你以为我贫穷、卑微、不美、瘦小、我就没有灵魂、没有心了吗？你想错了。
在文学史上、有许多的经典名著永垂不朽、但能像《简爱》这样深入人心的却不多、它以一种让人不可抗拒的美感吸引了众多的读者、给读者们留下了深刻的印象、也使他们的灵魂得到了升华、同时影响着他们的精神世界。
简爱生存在一个父母双亡、寄人篱下的环境、从小就承受着与同龄人不同的待遇、里德夫人的嫌弃、约翰的辱骂和毒打、这是对一个孩子自尊的践踏、但简爱并没有因此而变得怨恨、内心充满阴霾、相反的、她的内心因此而变得更加强大、这早就了她面对困难坚强不屈的品格。
文章中的伊丽莎自私任性、却受到尊敬、乔治亚娜好使性子、心肠狠毒、却能得到所有人的纵容、约翰什么坏事都做、纵然与他的母亲做对、也不会使她迁怒、而简爱无论做什么都全力以赴、不敢有一点闪失、却还是被人骂、得不到他们的喜爱、这体现出了当时社会的无情与冷漠。
简爱并不因为自己的身份卑微而感到自卑、并认为自己与罗切斯特是*等的、她纯洁、高尚的心灵使罗切斯特深深地爱上了她、并开始了对她的追求、然而、在他们结婚的当天、简爱得知他已有妻子时、她毅然的离开了他、他放弃了金钱和地位、我想、现在的社会上、很少会有人做出与简爱相同的抉择、利益的诱惑蒙蔽了人们的双眼、只是大多数人选择了利益而不是离开。
简爱是大多数读者所敬佩的应该是她的品格、她独立、坚强的品格、让很多人赞叹不已。
小说设计了一个完美的结局、虽然罗切斯特的庄园被毁了、他自己也变成了残废、但正是这样一个条件、使简爱不在与个人尊严与爱之间产生矛盾、他毫不犹豫的拒绝了里弗斯的求婚、而选择了罗切斯特、这说明了她对罗切斯特的真心。
而如今、在穷与富之间、在爱与不爱之间、很少会有人像简爱一样为人格抛弃所有、而且义无反顾、这篇小说不仅使读者的灵魂得到了净化、同时也使读者产生了共鸣、使读者受益匪浅。
人，最应该有的就是感恩之心，学会感恩。
《简爱》这部作品让我看到了人类之间的感情，有人们追求金钱黑暗，有“灰姑娘”为爱情的奋斗，我更看见了，简那颗感恩之心。
简爱的父母早亡，她一直寄居在舅舅家，寄人篱下的环境，从小就承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇，姨妈的嫌弃，表姐的蔑视，表哥的侮辱和毒打。舅舅病逝后，舅母把她送进孤儿院，遇到了一个可爱的朋友：海伦·彭斯，海伦温顺、聪颖和无比宽容的性格一直影响着简。爱，使之以后面对种种困难都不再屈服抱怨，懂得了爱和忠诚。
简爱从令人讨厌的学校毕业，在罗契斯特先生的庄园找了份家教的工作，负责教育罗契斯特先生的女儿，罗彻先生脾气古怪，经过几次接触，在此过程中两人擦出爱的火花。不久，里德太太派人来找简，说她病危要见简一面。回到舅母家中，里德太太给她一封信，这封信是三年前简的叔父寄来的，向她打听侄女的消息，并把自己的遗产交给简。里德太太谎称简在孤儿院病死了，直到临终前才良心发现把真相告诉简。
在他们举行婚礼时，梅森闯进来指出古堡顶楼小屋里的`疯女人是罗彻司特先生的妻子，简爱不愿作为情妇，离开了桑恩费尔德。
碰到自己的表哥表妹，来到一个偏远的地方在牧师的帮助下找到了一个乡村教师的职业。在牧师向简爱提出结婚时，正当简爱犹豫是否与表哥一起离开英国做传教士的妻子时，罗契斯特的庄园由于疯妻纵火毁于一旦，他本人也受伤致盲，心灵有所感应的简爱赶回庄园。当赶回桑恩费尔德时古堡已成废墟。原来几个月前，在一个风雨交加的夜晚，疯女人伯莎放火烧毁了整个庄园，罗彻斯特为了救她，被烧瞎了双眼，孤独地生活在几英里外的一个农场里。简赶到家场，向他吐露自己的爱情，他们终于结婚了。
两年之后，治好了罗彻斯特的一只眼睛，他看到了简为他生的第一个孩子。
人们都疯狂地似乎为了金钱和地位而淹没爱情。在穷与富之间选择富，在爱与不爱之间选择不爱。很少有人会像简这样为爱情为人格抛弃所有，而且义无反顾。她教会所有人用一颗爱的心看待世界，用一颗感恩的心对待所有人。
抱着应付公事的心态，毫不情愿的拿起了这本早被我遗忘到九霄云外的《简爱》，不得不承认，我读书的态度随着故事情节的发展跌宕起伏，我被故事情节深深的吸引住了，当小简爱被斥骂的时候，我不禁对这位被命运捉弄的孩子报以同情的眼光，或者在她的眼中，这所谓的同情是对她的蔑视，她不需要，童年的悲惨遭遇让她反感，也会让他感到痛恨。
或者是海伦和谭波儿小姐的出现，让她学会了改变，但在闲暇之余，我们不得不感慨当时社会的无情与冷漠。伴着简爱的每一次的化险为夷，我不禁为她欢呼，当他勇敢拒绝圣约翰的求婚而坚持自己的真爱时，我被她的选取所感动，当她去照顾已经残疾的罗切斯特的时候，带给人们的不仅仅仅是感动，更多的是心灵的震撼。
每一段的经历更重要的还是写出了一个青春少女的情感纠葛和心路历程，她的心灵矛盾和内心冲突，她对自由幸福生活的渴望、憧憬和追求，将女主人公的热情奔放，藐视*俗，追求**的个性，表现得淋漓尽致。充满希望
从简爱的身上，不得不对这天的生活报以庆幸，相比较而言，我们所缺少的不都在简爱的身上体现出来了吗，无论是从精神上还是生活中，简爱的任何一点都就应是我们学*的楷模，是当今社会的典范。
——简爱读后感英文版通用五篇
Oliver Twist, one of the most famous worksof Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life inBritain in 18th century.
The author who himself was born in a poorfamily wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks ofthose cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneaththe narrow and dirty streets in London.
The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, anorphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He sufferedenormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading thetragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. Ifelt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and thebrutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodnesseventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of theplots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowedto recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. Hewent for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at hislessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime andhardship and poverty.
How can such a little boy who had alreadysuffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is thenature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in thenovel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty.Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those whoare kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.
For me, the nature of goodness is one ofthe most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water isto fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On thecontrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the handthat gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and usefulperson. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also getsgratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people hehas helped and himself.
To my disappointment, nowadays some peopleseem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down onpeople’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to bewarm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in troubleand seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance tomoney and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object whileemotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showingtheir ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and evenhit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.
Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness,of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the characterof the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, nobetter than a kind of vermin.’
That is to say a person without goodness isdestined to lose everything.
Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”,it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way,but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person,both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister,whose parents went off when she was very young,and her aunt,the only relative she had,treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began,she didn’t get what she had been expecting——sim*** being regarded as a mon person,just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything else.As a reward of revolting the ruthleoppression,Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden.
There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner,Rochester,a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on,but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry,she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife,who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodineall the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand,however,she made up her mind to leave,because she didn’t want to betray her own principles,because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife,Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel,but frankly speaking,I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing,this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another,this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong ing with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story,but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates,you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother,in the film “Forrest Gump”)
What’s more,this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself,there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude,but for Rochester,how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact,when Jane met Rochester for the first time,she scared his horse and made his heel strained,to a certain extent,which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning.
The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it,Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
Jane. Love living in a parents， sponsor， grew up under the environment of treatment with peers， aunt abandon， cousin contempt， cousin insults and beating of a child… this is the dignity of the ruthletrample， but perhaps because it all， Jane. Love and faith of infinite indomitable spirit， a kind of inner personality can win.
In rochester， she never because he is a teacher and the family status meanness， but that they feel inferior is equal. Should not because she is a servant， but not respected by others. Also because of her integrity， noble and pure heart， no pollution， secular society for the shock， and rochester her as a spiritual and equality in the conversation， and slowly and dee*** in love with her.
Jane eyre itself to us is a kind of simplified， is a fanpiaoguizhen， is a kind of pursuit of whole heart feeling， is a kind of simplified feelings and neglected， it is like a cup of water， purify every reader's heart， also cause readers， especially female readers.
"Love" in the history of English literature is handed down as a classic,it has successfully shaped the history of English literature first on love,life,society and religion,have taken a stand on one's own initiative and dare to struggle,dare to fight for freedom and equality of female image.
Almost all women love foreign literature,like D Charlotte's "in love".If we think that Charlotte is only just to write this section of tangled up love to write "love".I think,sorry,that's not correct.The author also is a female,living in turbulent England in the middle of the nineteenth Century,when the thoughts have a brand new start.And in "Jane love" in infiltration is the largest such thoughts -- women's sense of independence.Let us imagine,if Jane love independent,has been killed in his childhood; if she did not share the independent,she already and wife Rochester to live together,began to have money,a new life; if she is not that the purity,we are now in the hands of "Jane love" is no longer a touching tears classic.So,I began to think,why "Jane love" let us be moved,fondle admiringly -- she is independent personality,beckoning personality charm.
However,we can't help wanting to ask,only this step can be independent?I think I won't.After all,women's independence is a long-term process,not acplish at one stroke.It needs a thorough courage,love was like Jane decided to leave Rochester,need "wind rustling Xi the Yi River is so cold,strong earth to did not return" heroic and courage.I think,this should be the most crucial one step,also should be the decisive step towards independence.And Charlotte's Jane love but her stubborn disposition,independent personality left us a moved.So she is successful,happy women.
Jane love has as an independent women's classic,I hope the sun,the flowers more Jane love out,whether poor or rich,; whether beauty,or homely,have good heart and enrich the mind,can the independent personality and strong character life.
”Jane Eyre” is a novel with a rotation of the color, it told people the true meaning of life.
”Jane Eyre” Bronte, author of gentle, pure, like the pursuit of some good things, despite the poverty of her family, from the loss of maternal love, combined with her short stature, appearance is not outstanding, but perhaps such a soul deep inferiority complex, reflected in her character is a very self-esteem. Her of Jane Eyre is a beautiful, little woman, but she has an extremely strong sense of self.
Jane Eyre in a survival environment, from an early age with their peers under the same treatment as people do not, aunt of the , cousin of contempt, insult and tortured cousin …… perhaps it is because of all this, for Back to the Jane Eyre indomitable confidence and strong , a personality to overcome the inherent strength. she has steadfastly pursued a bright, holy, better life.
In before, she never because he is an inferior status of the family teachers feel inferior, but think they are equal. It is because of her integrity, high moral character, pure, spiritual not secular society of pollution, making Rochester was shocked, and she can be seen as an equal in spirit and their own people to talk to, and dee*** in love with her .
And when they get married that day, Jane Eyre know Rochester has a wife, she must feel that they want to leave, although she said, “I want God to com*** with the law issued by the world , I would like to stick to living a sober and sometimes I was not as so crazy now when accepted . ” But speaking from the heart, deeper love Jane realize that they are being cheated, she’s self-esteem has been teased because she loved Rochester. However, Jane Eyre has made a very rational decision. In such a strength of love under siege, in the prosperous life under the , she still has to adhere to their own dignity as an individual, this is the spirit of Jane Eyre the most charming place.
Novel design of a very bright at the end – although Rochester’s manor destroyed, he himself became a disability, but it is such a condition, so that Jane Eyre is no longer in the dignity and the conflict between love and at the same time access to their own dignity and love.
In today’s society, people are mad for money and status of submerged love. In between poor and rich choice of the rich, and in love with does not love does not love to choose between. Few people will be like this for the love of Jane Eyre to abandon all for the character, and without looking back. “Jane Eyre” by the show to us is a kind of getting back to basics, is a fully paid by the pursuit of love, there are as a human being should have dignity. It is like a cup of ice water, purifying the hearts of everyone.
《简爱》是一部带有自转色彩的小说，它告诉人们一个人生的真谛。
《简爱》的作者夏洛蒂勃朗特温柔，清纯，喜欢追求一些美好的东西，尽管她家境贫穷，从小失去了母爱，再加上她身材矮小，容貌不出众，但也许就是这样一种灵魂深处的自卑，反映在她的性格上就是一种非常敏感的自尊。她描写的简爱也是一个不美的，矮小的女人，但是她有着极其强烈的自尊心。
简爱生存在一个寄人篱下的环境，从小就承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇，姨妈的嫌弃，表姐的蔑视，表哥的侮辱和毒打……也许正是因为这一切，换回了简爱无限的信心和坚强不屈的性格，一种可战胜的内在人格力量.她坚定不移地去追求一种光明的，圣洁的，美好的生活。
在罗切斯特的面前，她从不因为自己是一个地位低贱的家庭教师而感到自卑，反而认为他们是*等的。也正因为她的正直，高尚，纯洁，心灵没有受到世俗社会的污染，使得罗切斯特为之震撼，并把她看作了一个可以和自己在精神上*等交谈的人，并且深深爱上了她。
而当他们结婚的那一天，简爱知道了罗切斯特已有妻子时，她觉得自己必须要离开，她虽然讲，“我要遵从上帝颁发世人认可的法律，我要坚守住我在清醒时而不是像现在这样疯狂时所接受的原则”。但是从内心讲，更深一层的是简爱意识到自己受到了欺骗，她的`自尊心受到了戏弄，因为她深爱着罗切斯特。但简爱做出了一个非常理性的决定。在这样一种爱情力量包围之下，在富裕的生活诱惑之下，她依然要坚持自己作为个人的尊严，这是简爱最具有精神魅力的地方。
小说设计了一个很光明的结尾－－虽然罗切斯特的庄园毁了，他自己也成了一个残废，但正是这样一个条件，使简爱不再在尊严与爱之间矛盾，而同时获得自己的尊严和真爱。
在当今社会，人们都疯狂地为了金钱和地位而淹没爱情。在穷与富之间选择富，而在爱与不爱之间选择不爱。很少有人会像简爱这样为爱情为人格抛弃所有，而且义无反顾。《简爱》所展现给我们的正是一种返朴归真，是一种追求全心付出的爱情，还有作为一个人应有的尊严。它犹如一杯冰水，净化每一个人的心灵。
